On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:19:25PM +0100, Roman Pretory wrote:
> First Thanks for Help
you're welcome!
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Herbert Poetzl [mailto:herbert@13thfloor.at]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. März 2006 19:48
> An: Roman Pretory
> Cc: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> Betreff: Re: [Vserver] Network, Shapping, util
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 04:34:06PM +0100, Roman Pretory wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > A lot of Questions.... :-)
> > Maybe one have answers or ideas
> >
> > Thanks Roman
> >
> >
> #===========================================================================
> > ====================
> >
> > 1) seperate Network on node
> >
> > have a node with 2 nics
> >
> > eth0 is 192.168.2.2/255.255.255.0 connected to Zywall LAN-Interface
> > eth1 is 10.0.0.1/255.255.255.0 connected to Zywall DMZ-Interface
> >
> > How to seperate the vservers to be only in DMZ /LAN without lossing
> > the connection to Internen (Gateway) and be shure that no connact is
> > possibe from LAN to DMZ over the Node
> >
> > and able to connect server vom LAn in the DMZ
> >
> > Have played a long time with iptables and networkconfigs no idea left
> > to test :-(
>
> http://archives.linux-vserver.org/200311/0470.html
>
> from http://linux-vserver.org/Documentation (Archived Knowledge)
>
> It will Help
> Thanks
>
> >
> #===========================================================================
> > ====================
> >
> > 2) Shapping CPU / set limit on CPU
> >
> > is it possible to give a vserver only 50% of the cpu or better to
> > give 10% fix and if free more or up to xx% like cir/eir
>
> http://linux-vserver.org/Scheduler+Parameters
>
> (same source, Howtos)
>
> latest devel versions support setting two pairs of
> scheduler parameters, one for the 'guarantee' and
> another one for the idle case, which allows to utilize
> otherwise unused cpu resources
>
> devel?!
> how long you think for stabil
well, as soon as it is well tested and considered
stable (which I think should not take too long for
the scheduler changes)
> is it usable only with util or also with Vserver
hmm, I assume that question was regarding tools,
so the answer here is, yes you can use it with
_any_ tools, as long as they support the api ...
> I need it for produktion use
>
> is there a group for beta testing is there a
> place free or could i help?!
testing is always welcome, reporting back even more :)
folks usually decide for devel or stable according
to their personal preference, while experimental, the
third branch/category is only for the bold ones, unless
it is a release candidate series as we have for 2.0.2
and 2.1.1 right now ...
usually devel has a bunch of nice features, but might
break somewhere and/or have small issues (which will
get fixed as soon as they are reported back), while
the stable branch is thoroughly tested before it is
released and should be clean ...
> #===========================================================================
> > ====================
> >
> > 3) traffice shaping
> >
> > have anyone a working howto already testet and running in production mode
> > seperate node, vservers and services per vserver/node
>
> TC is your friend here ...
>
>
> Thanks I have already meet "him" :-)
> Only need Infos of Produktion experiences, to make not errors twice
i.c. guess folks can help here ...
> #===========================================================================
> > ====================
> >
> > 4) move from vserver: 0.40 to util-vserver
> >
> > exist a howto??
> > convert vserver possible --without loosing anything
> > <http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/d_rel26/v1.9.1/util-vserver-0.29.5.tar>
>
> hmm, you probably want util-vserver 0.30.210, the config
> is described on the FlowerPage (referenced on the main page)
> and probably the simplest way to 'upgrade' the config is
> one of the scripts floating around to do that, or alternatively
> the -m skeleton build method which should be quite simple
> to use to get a new config ...
>
> HTH,
> Herbert
>
> NO I don`t but if I read the pages
> (http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.01/)
> there is no info about vserver only util
> so I think this is the future or the better way, is it??
the util-vserver tools have become quite stable, and
they are currently considered the 'safe' way to go ...
> or is vserver so good as
>
> as i testet maybe by version patch 28 for kernel 2.4.xx util make a
> lot of troubles I can't get it to run clean,
sounds like it was a long time ago, anyway, any tools
which WorkForYou(tm) are fine, may they be from Jack
or Enrico or recently Hollow/Bonbons, just make sure
that they support what you want and that somebody cares
about fixing issues you encounter ...
> vservers works there are rpm so no wish by install perfect
>
> Thanks
> Roman
best,
Herbert
> #===========================================================================
> > ====================
> >
> > Config:
> >
> > Kernel: 2.6.12.3 / 2.6.14.7
> > patch: 2.0 / 2.01
> > vserver: 0.40
> > node:fc3
> > hosts rh 9/fc1-3 /debian
> >
> >
> #===========================================================================
> > ====================
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Thu Mar 9 05:08:00 2006