From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Mon 04 Nov 2002 - 19:20:14 GMT

• Next message: Jacques Gelinas: "Re: [vserver] vserver sharing host-server IP address (was: Bug?)"
• Previous message: Klavs Klavsen: "Re: [vserver] Solved: capabilities required for access to /proc/kmsg?"
• In reply to: djp_at_comm.it: "[vserver] Multiple IP and binding to 0.0.0.0"
• Next in thread: rrolfe_at_genpac.com: "RE: [vserver] more questions"

On Fri, 1 Nov 2002 18:09:10 -0500, djp_at_comm.it wrote
> The current behaviour when binding to 0.0.0.0 in a context is that the
> process will bind to the FIRST of the available context IP addresses (I
> haven't tested this, just serving it from memory).
>
> However, it would seem more natural that the process bind to ALL
> available addresses of the context.
>
> Does anyone agree with me?

Absolutly. But until now, we did not know how to handle this efficiently. I think
we got it now. Working on the implementation.

---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc

• Next message: Jacques Gelinas: "Re: [vserver] vserver sharing host-server IP address (was: Bug?)"
• Previous message: Klavs Klavsen: "Re: [vserver] Solved: capabilities required for access to /proc/kmsg?"
• In reply to: djp_at_comm.it: "[vserver] Multiple IP and binding to 0.0.0.0"
• Next in thread: rrolfe_at_genpac.com: "RE: [vserver] more questions"