On 2 08 2011 19:17 Ed W <lists@wildgooses.com> wrote:
> Exactly. I'm currently running .32 and .38 on my servers, but as they
> are "satisfactory" today, I would have no particular desire to see them
> improved further. If I bought new hardware or had a desire to change
> the running kernel then it would be because I needed some new feature in
> 3.x or whatever
>
> I think a few folks are still saying .32 because it's what they are
> running today (that's what I'm running also). However, remember you
> need to think about what you want to run in 1-2 years time... (this
> doesn't mean you Adrian, just trying to influence people generally!)
Sure.
Daniel suggested a good solution:
> My vote is for 3.0. I will likely keep maintaining my RHEL6-based
> 2.6.32 kernel and backport the majority of changes done for the
> stabilization there.
Best regards,
-- Lukasz CzarnowskiReceived on Wed Aug 3 12:59:52 2011