Re: [Vserver] clusters/farms/failovers?

On Friday 22 June 2007 07:10, Raoul Bhatia [IPAX] wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
> > after finding some information in other list archives, i see the control
> > doesn't need a lot of horsepower and that 1gb ram is good for approx 5
> > million simultaneous connections! so yeah. that machine can be downgraded
> > quite affordably.
>
> please keep in mind that you will need multiple ip addresses to achieve
> that as you're limited to approx 64k usable ports and therefore
> connections in tcp.
>
>

there are more than 247 unique ip addresses across 4 networks so i think we
are ok there :)

> for gfs (or better gfs2): i did not succeed in getting it up and
> running. ocfs2 has been no problem.
>
> i had a small talk with the developer of drbd where i came to the
> conclusion that i should favor ocfs2 anyway.
>

will have a look at that also. thank you.

> hth,
> raoul bhatia
> --
> ____________________________________________________________________
> dipl.-ing. (fh) raoul bhatia email. r.bhatia@ipax.at
> IPAX web. http://www.ipax.at
> chief technician, support irc. #ipax (quakenet)
> ____________________________________________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>

-- 
Chuck
"...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath
or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose 
for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. "
The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver