I think they are intuitive as well. It looks good to me.
On 9/28/06, Tim Mecking <as.6917.1@mecking.net> wrote:
> Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
> > What's with all the funky signs after filenames? Wouldn't it be better
> > with something like what the boring CSS template has, i.e. [symlink],
> > [script], etc?
>
> Maybe..
> As I always disable css at the flower page I didn't take it into
> consideration.
>
> The 'funky' signs are basically taken from 'ls -F' ( '/' for directory,
> '@' for symlinks, '*' for executables. The rest are supplemented ('#'
> for hash files, '<num>'/'<min>-<max>' for number of lines in the files).
>
> I think these signs are quite intuitive.
>
> Ciao
> Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Thu Sep 28 15:29:30 2006