RE: [Vserver] great flower page

From: ehab heikal <ehab_at_elmotaheda.com>
Date: Sun 23 Apr 2006 - 12:02:19 BST
Message-ID: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA/Qvef0g4/UOWJaXT4SgsZcKAAAAQAAAAsoTZEeA4RUuLaT9rclEFmwEAAAAA@elmotaheda.com>

This is just a thought . As other virtualization technologies are
gaining momentum we need to make this one as easy as possible for the
newcomer to widen our user base and potentially be included in the
mainstream kernel. Which is was swsoft want to do with their virtuozzo
kernel.

-----Original Message-----
From: vserver-bounces@list.linux-vserver.org
[mailto:vserver-bounces@list.linux-vserver.org] On Behalf Of Oliver
Welter
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2006 11:44 AM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: Re: [Vserver] great flower page

Hi Folks,

> I'm agree, I've prefered the old vserver style to configure with one
> file per vserver like in freevps
> Moreover most of Linux program use only one file to config ...
> I don't see where is easier to maintain it ? ...

It's much easier to deploy and modfiy the configuration on this basis
when using automated scripts...I use vserver to implement some failover
stuff and unfortunately the boxes differ sligthly - this way its much
easier to sync only certain files, and ignore others. Besides it is
easier to just put some own config stuff vor own scripts.
So I prefer this style as it is easier to manage by scripts

Oliver

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde digital unterschrieben
oliwel's public key: http://www.oliwel.de/oliwel.crt
Basiszertifikat: http://www.ldv.ei.tum.de/page72
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Sun Apr 23 16:52:54 2006
[Next/Previous Months] [Main vserver Project Homepage] [Howto Subscribe/Unsubscribe] [Paul Sladen's vserver stuff]
Generated on Sun 23 Apr 2006 - 16:52:57 BST by hypermail 2.1.8