On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 08:44:27AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yet another test ;<)
>
> First, it's against latest vs2.1.1-rc9 for rc4 kernel 2.6.16.
>
> Second, trust me it's always test fine with 32 bit up build of this kernel but
> the new is that it's also fine with the smp build (it's the first time I had
> the oportunity to run this test):
>
> # ./ReportVserverTest
> Linux patst007 2.6.16-rc4-vs2.1.1-rc9-pa1-d32mp #1 SMP Thu Feb 23 20:34:05 CET
> 2006 parisc GNU/Linux
> Linux-VServer Test [V0.15] Copyright (C) 2003-2006 H.Poetzl
> chcontext is working.
> chbind is working.
> Linux 2.6.16-rc4-vs2.1.1-rc9-pa1-d32mp #1 SMP Thu Feb 23 20:34:05 CET 2006 parisc
> Ea 0.30.210 263/fallback (S*) <v13,net>
> VCI: 0002:0001 263 03000116 (TbLgnP)
> ---
> [000]# succeeded.
> [001]# succeeded.
> [011]# succeeded.
> [031]# succeeded.
> [101]# succeeded.
> [102]# succeeded.
> [201]# succeeded.
> [202]# succeeded.
> ---
> [L01]# succeeded.
> [D01]# succeeded.
> [L02]# succeeded.
> [D02]# succeeded.
> [L03]# succeeded.
> [D03]# succeeded.
> [L11]# succeeded.
> [D11]# succeeded.
> [L12]# succeeded.
> [D12]# succeeded.
> [L21]# succeeded.
> [D21]# succeeded.
> [L22]# succeeded.
> [D22]# succeeded.
> [L31]# succeeded.
> [D31]# succeeded.
> Linux-VServer FS Test [V0.12] Copyright (C) 2005-2006 H.Poetzl
> Linux 2.6.16-rc4-vs2.1.1-rc9-pa1-d32mp parisc/0.30.210
> VCI: 0002:0001 263 03000116 (ugid24)
> ---
> testing ext2 filesystem ...
> [000]. (ext2 format)
> xid related tests ...
> [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019].
> [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028].
> [033]. [034]. [035]. [037].
> xattr related tests ...
> [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109].
> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199].
>
> ---
> testing ext3 filesystem ...
> [000]. (ext3 format)
> xid related tests ...
> [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019].
> [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028].
> [033]. [034]. [035]. [037].
> xattr related tests ...
> [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109].
> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199].
>
> ---
> testing xfs filesystem ...
> [000]. (xfs format)
> xid related tests ...
> [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019].
> [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028].
> [033]. [034]. [035]. [037].
> xattr related tests ...
> [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109].
> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199].
>
> ---
> testing reiser filesystem ...
> [000]. (reiserfs format)
> xid related tests ...
> [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019].
> [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028].
> [033]. [034]. [035]. [037].
> xattr related tests ...
> [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109].
> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199].
>
> ---
> testing jfs filesystem ...
> [000]. (jfs format)
> xid related tests ...
> [001]. [002]. [011]. [012]. [014]. [015]. [019].
> [020]. [021]. [022]. [023]. [024]. [025]. [026]. [027]. [028].
> [033]. [034]. [035]. [037].
> xattr related tests ...
> [101]. [102]. [103]. [104]. [106]. [108]. [109].
> [112]. [113]. [114]. [115]. [116]. [117]. [118]. [119].
> [121]. [122]. [123]. [124]. [199].
>
> Hth,
> Joel
>
> PS: btw Herbert, as in general it seems to work fine on parisc-linux
> arch (at least 32bit build), I think that I will just continue to test
> new patches and just report in case of failure. What's your opinion?
thanks a lot for the time you put into this, we will
pretty soon add an option to simplify sending such a
test email somewhere (e.g. this or another ML) and I
think it doesn't hurt to get such reports and not just
the failures, for two reasons:
- first, it's really nice and comfy to see that every
thing (the tested stuff) is working as expected
- second, if we do not get a message for some time,
we do not know anything (you could just have stopped
testing and everything broke) this way we can later
search the archive and say: "look it worked back
then"
so, if that is fine with you, I'd appreciate to continue
the report (we will see that it gets automated soon)
btw, I'd appreciate to see more such tests here, and I
hope that the auto-submit feature will be used by many
folks once it is implemented so that we get a better
idea what works and what not ...
thanks again,
Herbert
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> A free anti-spam and anti-virus filter on all Scarlet mailboxes
> More info on http://www.scarlet.be/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Received on Fri Feb 24 11:35:31 2006