From: [eMAXX] Sys-Admin (sys-admin_at_emaxx.nl)
Date: Wed 14 Sep 2005 - 13:41:11 BST
Matvey Gladkikh wrote:
>On 14/09/05 14:13 +0200, [eMAXX] Sys-Admin wrote:
>
>
>>What I am going to do now:
>>
>>1. Install the new kernel from http://linux-vserver.derjohn.de/
>>(shouldn't be that hard ;) )
>><reboot>
>>2. Get the util-vserver sources
>>3. Patch them with fix02
>>4. ./configure them (should I fix the path and/or prefix?)
>>5. Done?
>>
>>
>>
>I do not know what is the "fix02"
>but seems ok.
>
>Cheers,
>Matvey
>
>_______________________________________________
>Vserver mailing list
>Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
>http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
>
>
Well I don't know what fix01 is :) With both fix01 & fix02 I refer to a
post of:
---
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
| I search the irc-log and then tried this:
| ~# /usr/lib/util-vserver/vprocunhide /proc/net/: Bad
address
| /proc/sys/: Bad address
| /proc/sys/debug/: Bad address
etc.
Sounds like fix01 was used rather than fix02.
---
I thinks fix02 is just:
http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.0/patch-0.30.208-fix02.diff
(as it name implies).
Regards,
Vincent Pluk
eMAXX, Netherlands
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver