From: Herbert Poetzl (herbert_at_13thfloor.at)
Date: Mon 11 Apr 2005 - 00:07:23 BST
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:54:38AM +1200, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
> > here is an example which simply fails on x86_64 when
> > compiled with dietlibc (0.27, 0.28, cvs, debian, fc3, suse ;)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > $ diet gcc -o sysx sysx.c -lcompat
> >
> > $ ./sysx
> > $ echo $?
> > 236
>
> What is the expected behaviour? With glibc I'm getting:
> # ./sysx
> ret = 65573
>
> However when changed your testcase to use _syscall3() as utils-vserver
> do I'm getting the same output even with dietlibc.
ah, that's a good hint, probably _syscall3() is present
in your includes, could you upload/post the header file
which contains that (for x86_64)?
TIA,
Herbert
> Michal Ludvig
> --
> * Personal homepage: http://www.logix.cz/michal
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver