From: Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy (grisha_at_ispol.com)
Date: Wed 17 Mar 2004 - 16:32:52 GMT

• Previous message: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions"
• In reply to: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions"
• Next in thread: Thomas Guettler: "vproc vs. setattr Was: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions"

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:

> > /proc/mounts is evil too since it discloses the devices where the
> > virtual server and other virtual servers are mounted.
> I don't think proc/mounts counts as 'evil'.
>
> Although it would be nice to have virutalised and configurable
> proc/mounts

Evil or not, it doesn't look like it can be hidden using vproc anyway:

> On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:10, Herbert Poetzl wrote:

> note: symbolic links and dynamically generated
> entries like /proc/<pid> can not be masked by this
> interface yet ...

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions"
• In reply to: Dariush Pietrzak: "Re: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions"
• Next in thread: Thomas Guettler: "vproc vs. setattr Was: [Vserver] proc not mounted and other suggestions"