From: Sam Vilain (sam_at_vilain.net)
Date: Fri 31 Oct 2003 - 11:26:21 GMT

• Previous message: Christian Mayrhuber: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"
• In reply to: Herbert Poetzl: "[Vserver] any last comments?"

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 01:47, Herbert Poetzl wrote;

> If you would like to comment on c17f, which
> is going to be released as vserver-1.0, please
> do it now ...

Why does the version that doesn't use our allocated syscall number
deserve the `debut' stable release?

I suggest that this version be released as 0.9.0, and c17g+ can be
1.0.0pre1. The last number can be reserved for bugfix releases only,
the second for new features, and the first for major project
reshaping.

This will make it a lot easier to track backporting fixes to the older
versions, so that we don't keep telling people "upgrade all your
userland tools to get this one-line fix"..

-- 
Sam Vilain, sam_at_vilain.net
Real software engineers don't program in assembler.  They become
queasy at the very thought.
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver_at_www.solucorp.qc.ca
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/mailman/listinfo/vserver

• Previous message: Christian Mayrhuber: "Re: [Vserver] any last comments?"
• In reply to: Herbert Poetzl: "[Vserver] any last comments?"