From: Dinesh Mistry (dmistry_at_yourhostdirect.com)
Date: Fri 25 Apr 2003 - 02:11:43 BST
Oh what kernel version and CTX patch are you using?
--------------------------------------------
Dinesh Mistry
YourHostDirect
1-800-210-6757
Better, Faster and more Reliable Hosting
http://www.yourhostdirect.com
--------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Matthieu Racine [mailto:m.racine_at_free.fr]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 7:02 PM
To: vserver_at_solucorp.qc.ca
Subject: Re: [vserver] named and multiple IP address's
Hi,
I'm using Bind9 in a vserver with 3 IPs and I don't have the problem...
dnshost:~# netstat -anup
(Tous les processus ne peuvent �tre identifi�s, les infos sur les processus
non poss�d�s ne seront pas affich�es, vous devez �tre root pour les voir
toutes.)
Connexions Internet actives (serveurs et �tablies)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Adresse locale Adresse distante Etat
PID/Program name
udp 0 0 10.1.1.11:53 0.0.0.0:*
274/named
udp 0 0 10.1.0.11:53 0.0.0.0:*
274/named
udp 0 0 10.1.11.11:53 0.0.0.0:*
274/named
Is the 192.168.11.2 available in your vserver ?
Isn't there a named configured in your main server already listening on
udp/53 on 192.168.11.2 ?
regard,
Matthieu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dinesh Mistry" <dmistry_at_yourhostdirect.com>
To: <vserver_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:58 PM
Subject: [vserver] named and multiple IP address's
>
>
> All,
>
> I know that I have mentioned this before but I never got an answer to my
> question, what is the reason that named (either bind 8 or bind9) can not
> bind to more than one IP on port 53 I have tried to specify the listen-on
> and specify 2 IP's here and it still always goes back to one IP (the first
> IP listed in the configuration file)
>
> This is the error that I see in the logs.
>
> Apr 25 01:13:43 host01 named[1269]: listening on [192.168.11.1].53
> (eth0:eshani)
> Apr 25 01:15:43 host01 named[1269]: There may be a name server already
> running on [192.168.11.2].53
> Apr 25 01:15:43 host01 named[1269]: deleting interface [192.168.11.2].53
>
>
> It would be really helpful is some body could explain why this happens, is
a
> UDP thing?
>
> Thanks
>
> --------------------------------------------
> Dinesh Mistry
> --------------------------------------------