From: Matt Ayres (matta_at_kindhosts.com)
Date: Tue 17 Dec 2002 - 03:13:43 GMT
|kernel vers|ctx vers|smp|stable yes/no|info|
|2.4.19 | 14 |no |yes | preemptive, lowlatency, never
went down
once
|2.4.20 | 15/16 |yes|yes/no | first tried with preemptive, kept
panicing with errors in sched.c. Re-tried w/o preemp, same problem.
Removed 'sched' flag from vservers and the panicing stopped. Pretty sure
it had to do with SMP, but not sure why as others reported sucess with
SMP.
On 17 Dec 2002, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 00:55, Paul Sladen wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Cathy Sarisky wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Dinu Zabrauteanu wrote:
> > |kernel vers|ctx vers|stable yes/no|info|
> > |2.4.19 |13 | no | kernel crash
> > |2.4.19 |14/13 | no | no error messages,
> > |2.4.18 |12 | yes | 95 days uptime before a reboot for an
> > |2.4.19 |14 | yes | I think.. new box, about 20 days light load,
> > |2.4.19 |14 | yes | duron, software raid 1 ide
> >
> > |2.4.18 |10 | no | PIII, ~2-25days. Out-of-Memory is /different/
> > |2.4.19pre7 |10 | ish | PIV Promise `RAID', 3months (or 10hours...)
> >
>
>
> |2.4.19 |15 | yes | P3, lm-sensors patch, promise ctrl, avg. load
> Debian Woody, custom kernel. Not rebooted
> after applying the ctx patch.
> |2.4.19 |14 | yes | P3 SMP, lm-sensors patch, scsi
> testmachine, stresstesting, no problems
>
> Maybe it's early on the non-SMP P3, since i only had vserver on it for a
> few days yet, but the SMP machine has been running for weeks without
> trouble.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Martin List-Petersen
> martin at list-petersen dot dk
> --
> BOFH excuse #179:
>
> multicasts on broken packets
>