From: Jacques Gelinas (jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca)
Date: Wed 04 Dec 2002 - 05:01:18 GMT
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 23:21:02 -0500, Paul Sladen wrote
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jacques Gelinas wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:43:03 -0500, Paul Sladen wrote
> > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > > In article <20021202234619.64d35fd4dd6d_at_remtk.solucorp.qc.ca>, Jacques Gelinas
> wrote:
> > > > > -We also need private network loopback devices.
> > > No. Currently the `lo' loopback device looks like a shared peice of
> > Not exactly, although there is a bug in udp. 127.0.0.1 is rewritten [...]
>
> If people didn't understand:
>
> root_at_vs1:~$ tcpdump -i lo host vs2
Sure if you have the capability, but a vserver does not have this one by default.
The current design allows one to create vserver with all capability, including mknod
and full administration privilege.
On my box, tcpdump can't be used from a vserver (a normal one)
---------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Gelinas <jack_at_solucorp.qc.ca>
vserver: run general purpose virtual servers on one box, full speed!
http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc