From: Rik van Riel (riel_at_conectiva.com.br)
Date: Tue 23 Oct 2001 - 21:28:53 BST
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Jacques Gelinas wrote:
> I am open to that. The effect we want to achieve is to have on vserver
> not taking all the machine for itself. So it does not have to be 100%
> fair.
> What is the impact of this goodness change btw ? Does the division is
> causing some evil effect ?
Goodness is called every time we reschedule, for all runnable
tasks. Adding a *division* to goodness() will really make things
slower...
My fair scheduling approach, OTOH, is completely implemented in
the recalculation code of the scheduler and doesn't touch the
fast path.
regards,
Rik
-- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ (volunteers needed)